<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quality and the Great Contraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qualityandinnovation.com/2009/06/30/quality-and-the-great-contraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qualityandinnovation.com/2009/06/30/quality-and-the-great-contraction/</link>
	<description>exploring quality, productivity &#38; innovation in socio-technical systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:38:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Closer To The Ideal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geography still matters: physical proximity is essential to agile practices</title>
		<link>http://qualityandinnovation.com/2009/06/30/quality-and-the-great-contraction/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Closer To The Ideal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geography still matters: physical proximity is essential to agile practices]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qualityandinnovation.com/?p=755#comment-321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Nicole Radziwill approaches this subject from a different angle, but she makes a similar point about the importance of geography: Space does matter. We know this when we are designing facilities and plant layouts, for example, because one of our common considerations is to minimize traffic between areas and departments. More often than not, we do this to minimize the time spent moving people or equipment around a plant, so that time is not wasted. But the same concept could apply to our supply chains. Why aren’t we minimizing the time that components or goods spend traveling through the supply chain, when it could lead to reductions in energy costs? Furthermore, why aren’t we shortening our supply chains to strengthen local and regional businesses, and train the next generation of skilled workers (who can actually do something useful for the regional economy)? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nicole Radziwill approaches this subject from a different angle, but she makes a similar point about the importance of geography: Space does matter. We know this when we are designing facilities and plant layouts, for example, because one of our common considerations is to minimize traffic between areas and departments. More often than not, we do this to minimize the time spent moving people or equipment around a plant, so that time is not wasted. But the same concept could apply to our supply chains. Why aren’t we minimizing the time that components or goods spend traveling through the supply chain, when it could lead to reductions in energy costs? Furthermore, why aren’t we shortening our supply chains to strengthen local and regional businesses, and train the next generation of skilled workers (who can actually do something useful for the regional economy)? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

